Reactive call-outs
Doors, hardware, glazing, water ingress, make-safe and the things that go wrong at four in the afternoon.
A methodology does not fit a two-minute conversation on site. Four questions do. They are asked in whatever order the conversation goes.
The asset stays available while the work happens. The ward keeps admitting, the classroom keeps teaching, the platform keeps moving people.
Programmed to the site's calendar, not ours. Bell times, shift change, trading hours and possession windows set when the van turns up.
Triaged with clear scope, escalation and make-safe steps. Nothing extra gets done without a call back to you first.
Sometimes a full replacement, sometimes just the door handle. Every repair is connected to the next capital decision, not filed on its own.
We can always make it bigger. We can't make it smaller.
Delivered by our own people, from our own vans, with the same reporting on every job.
Doors, hardware, glazing, water ingress, make-safe and the things that go wrong at four in the afternoon.
Scheduled works across a portfolio, programmed to each site's calendar and reported the way the asset owner has to report it.
Upgrades, alterations and essential safety works: too small for a head contract, too important to hand to whoever is available.
Panel and framework work orders, closed with a note about what else we found while we were there.
Most builders treat maintenance as the thing that pays the overhead between real projects. We treat it as the place the relationship starts.
A tradesman who asks one extra question on a four-hundred-dollar call-out is the same business that runs a hospital ward program, and clients notice which one turned up.
The same team and the same four questions, from a call-out to a capital project.
A conversation on site. Two minutes. “What do you actually need here?”
One extra question before the tools come out, and a call back to the client before anything extra gets done.
The same four questions, evidenced: workshop, staging plan, risk register, the lot. Bigger, not different.
Alfred Health defined success in one measure: Trauma 1 back in operational use, fast. We coordinated an around-the-clock response and the works required to bring it back online, and Trauma 1 was returned to operational service.
“Thank you to you and your teams for bringing Trauma 1 back online. So much work, around the clock, went into making this happen.”
Plus government, university, cultural and industrial property portfolios.
Yes. Many engagements start with a maintenance program and grow into capital works from there. We agree the success measures at the start of the engagement, so the standard is the same on every job that follows.
Yes. We hold and maintain the pre-qualification, insurance and reporting requirements for ongoing panel delivery.
Directly employed delivery resources and a dedicated maintenance team, led by our Reactive Maintenance Manager, Megan Lee-Wrenn.
Start with what the project has to protect, and we will build the plan around it.
We use cookies to see how this site gets used, so we can make it more useful. Nothing is set until you choose. Read our privacy policy.